Pedro Alvarez and Dick Stuart

Perhaps no Pittsburgh Pirate in my recent memory, not even Barry Bonds, has stirred so much debate, pro and con, as has Pedro Alvarez.  I am not going to discuss Pedro's future, or what should the Pirates do with him going forward, both short- and long-term.  Those are topics for another day and will no doubt be discussed in the Blog at some future point.

Instead, I am going to take another approach here.  Pedro, with his jaw-dropping power and jaw-dropping fielding prowess, has often been compared with former Pirate Dick Stuart, especially since his move from third base to first base.  A question was raised in a Facebook forum just this morning, "Is Pedro the next Dick Stuart?"

So, I decided to open up a spread sheet and make a comparison between the two.

The numbers you will see below reflect Stuart's career only during his five seasons as a Pirate.  He went on, of course, to a ten year career with five other teams, most notably, the Boston Red Sox.  Alvarez' numbers are current through yesterday's game against the Rockies.

Here you go:

	Dick Stuart	Pedro Alvarez
Seasons	5	6
Plate Appearances	2.213	2,765
Hits	550	587
BA	0.273	0.243
HR	117	130
RBI	390	399
OPS	0.839	0.750
Strike Outs	483	806
Walks	158	254
K:W Ratio	3.06 to 1	3.17 to 1
Errors	90	131
All-Star Teams	1	1

In all honesty, I don't know what to make of these.  If you look at HR and RBI, which one could argue is what the Pirates have paid these two to do, a slight edge goes to Pedro.  Other categories favor, slightly, Stuart.  OPS is clearly in Big Stu's favor.  The errors tell a very bad story for both of them, especially Pedro.

Here are a couple of other stats for you who like modern analytics.  Stuart's WAR (Wins Above Replacement player) for his entire ten year career was 7.8.  Alvarez' WAR for his six years and counting career is 5.0.

In his career, Stuart made $278,500.  Alvarez has thus far earned $14,350,000.  That ought to get the old-timers riled up.

As I said, I have a hard time drawing any conclusions here.  The rest of you all can have at it.

Movie Thoughts..."Black Mass", "Psycho", "Casablanca" and the Price of Popcorn

Some movie thoughts and opinions....

Saw this movie this afternoon.

It is the story about Boston mobster James "Whitey" Bulger.  I love mob movies, and while this one is no "Goodfellas", and certainly no "Godfather", it's a pretty good one.  I was somewhat familiar with the Bulger story, but wasn't totally aware of the "deal with the devil" that the local Boston FBI office made with Bulger, nor was I aware of the prominence of Bulger's younger brother in Boston politics.  The best part of this movie is the performance of Johnny Depp.  There was a school of thought that Depp's career had descended into a series of parodies of his Capt. Jack Sparrow character, but not in this case.  He's dynamite as Whitey Bulger

One minor quibble.  I suppose that when you make a movie that takes place in Boston, everybody has to speak in over-exaggerated Boston accents (there were a few points where I wish there had been sub-titles).  It adds to the authenticity, I suppose, but sometimes it just seems so forced.

********

Earlier in the week we had seen the TCM/Fathom Events presentation of Alfred Hitchcock's "Psycho" on the big screen at the Cinemark North Hills.

It was terrific experience to see this in such a setting, and it prompted my mind to wander in the following direction:  With a movie that has been parodied so many times, and is so ingrained in our culture, was there anyone in the theater that night who was seeing "Psycho" for the first time?  Similarly, is there anyone out there who is unfamiliar with what "Psycho" is about?  Could there possibly be anyone to whom viewing this movie would be a completely blank page, and if so, what would they think viewing it for the first time in 2015?  

After seeing this movie on Sunday, I went on line and searched for reviews of this movie that were given at the time of its 1960 release.  The Internet makes it possible to find such things, and they make for interesting reading with fifty-five years of hindsight.

********

In conjunction with its current exhibit on World War II, the Heinz History Center is offering a "World War II Film Festival" this Saturday and Sunday in its Mueller Education Center this coming weekend.  I will be working as a Volunteer on Saturday afternoon when "Casablanca" will be shown.  Talk about being able to see a Classic on the Big Screen!

If you aren't doing anything this Saturday afternoon, think about stopping by.  Not sure what my volunteer role will be, but I just might be the guy to sell you a candy bar....or offer to procure a Letter of Transit for you!

********

Finally, when I went to see "Black Mass" this afternoon, I thought I'd treat myself to a bag of popcorn.  A small bag.  Note that I said a SMALL bag.  The price was $6.05.  Putting aside the outrageous price for something that probably cost less than a dime for the theater to produce, I had to laugh at the cost of six dollars and FIVE cents.  As I said to the young kid at the cash register, they must just LOVE having to count out ninety-five cents in change all the time.  I mean, really, how was it determined that this commodity should cost $6.05?

It just struck me as odd.

To Absent Friends - Yogi Berra

Yogi Berra

1925-2015

If any sports figure can be deemed to be a truly "original" character, one who has never been, and probably never will be duplicated, it is Lawrence Peter "Yogi" Berra, who died yesterday in New Jersey at the age of 90.

A member of Baseball's Hall of Fame, a case can be made that Berra was and remains the greatest catcher in baseball history.  The obituary that appears in today's New York Times (and I highly recommend that you read it;  it is easy enough to seek out and find on line) makes that case, but it also tells of the Yogi Berra who was a part of the D-Day invasion of Normandy in 1944 and who was awarded a Purple Heart for his service in the War.  It also tells of his 65 year marriage to his wife Carmen. But if it is baseball stuff you want, consider these facts about his nineteen year playing career....

• A  .285 lifetime batting average, 358 home runs and 1,430 RBI, and a career OPS of .830
• A fifteen time All-Star
• A three time MVP
• Only 430 strike outs in over 8,300 plate appearances
• A participant in 21 World Series, fourteen of them as a player, and a member of ten World Series winning teams
• He still holds World Series records for games played (75), plate appearances, hits (71), and doubles

However, in spite of all of those accomplishments, Berra is most famous for his wacky quotes and aphorisms, some of which he actually said, that have become a part of our everyday language, and are used by people who probably have no idea who Yogi Berra actually was.  You know the most famous of them:

• "90% of this game is mental, the other half is physical"
• "Nobody ever goes there anymore, it's always too crowded."
• "It gets late early out there."
• "You can observe a lot just by watching."

and of course the most famous of all, and it really is true, in life and in baseball, 

• "It ain't over 'til it's over."

Yet for all of Yogi's great lines, perhaps the best line of all comes not from Yogi himself, but from that Times obituary.  In referencing all those pennants and World Series, the Times simply said, "No other player has been a champion so often."  

What an epitaph.

RIP Yogi Berra.

Coaching Decisions and Overtime in Football

The Pitt Panthers traveled to Iowa, and lost for the first time this year by a score of 27-24.  It was great effort by Pitt, but in the end, the favored Hawkeyes prevailed.

There were three very interesting coaching decisions made in this game by Head Coach Pat Narduzzi, or HCPN, as he is referred to in the social media chat rooms.  And while I don't usually play the game of slicing and dicing coaching/managerial decision, I am going to do it here in regard to three decisions made by the coach.

GO FOR IT ON FOURTH?

With the score tied at 17-17 in the fourth quarter, Pitt faced a fourth-down-and-inches while in Iowa territory.  It wasn't deep in Iowa territory, but Iowa territory nonetheless.  Narduzzi indicated that Pitt would go for the first down.  They lined up and it soon became apparent that what he was really doing was trying to draw Iowa offsides.  It didn't work, and Pitt then punted.  Iowa took over, and proceeded to march down field and score to go ahead 24-17.  Pitt's offense was moving the ball and had Iowa on its heels, and punting instead of going for it was huge momentum shift in the game.  Even the the color announcer on the Big Ten Network doing the game, whoever he was, said that Pitt might come to regret taking their foot off the gas at that point.

Good decision or bad decision?  My guess is that this was probably the right decision at the time, although as an underdog playing on the road, maybe, as the announcer said, Pitt should have gone for it.

GO FOR TWO?

With under a minute to play, Pitt scores a TD to make the score 24-23 Iowa, and elects to kick an extra point and tie the game at 24-24.  Dan Bonk, who was at the game in Iowa, and I were texting each other simultaneously, saying that Pitt should have gone for the two points and the win right then and there and not take a chance in OT.  We both used more or less the same expression:  Show some cajones, we both said, although we used the English version of the word.

More on this later.

Iowa then took the kickoff, marched down the field, and kicked the winning field goal as the clock ran out.  This involved the third key coaching decision....

ICING THE KICKER. REALLY?

As Iowa kicker Marshall Koehn (pronounced "Kane", and, honestly, the kid looks nothing at all like Gary Cooper), lined up for the kick and at the last instant before the snap, Narduzzi made the oh-so-predictable coach's move of calling a time out in order to "ice" the kicker.  The snap was made and Koehn went through with the kick and came up well short on the 57 yard attempt.  Koehn said later that he heard the whistle and didn't give the kick his full effort, hence, the miss.  Maybe he didn't and maybe he did, but what is indisputable is that when given a second chance to kick, he drilled it right through the uprights and won the game for Iowa.

I don't know who the first coach was to come up with this ridiculous strategy, but every coach copycats this move, and to me it is more of the coach saying "look how smart and clever I am" than it is a sound strategic move.  Perhaps there is some football sabrmetric stat that shows that this is a move that works because the kicker turns into a bundle of jangled nerves and misses the subsequent kick ___% of the time.  If that is the case, I'd like to see it.  I can't recall seeing it ever work.

(Of course, if Pitt's defense doesn't allow Iowa to march down the field in the last fifty-two seconds and get into position to kick a field goal, this is a moot point, but that is another discussion entirely.)

I posted these latter two opinions on a Pitt Facebook page last night and was ripped for being a second guesser (like the people who said that aren't), and contradictory ("if he went for two and they didn't make it, you'd be ripping him for that.").  The sentiment also was that you always play for a tie and take your chances in overtime, and that leads me to a long held thought of mine, and that is, Why is there overtime in regular season football games?  So what if a game ends in a tie? I can remember the great Myron Cope once saying that while tie games can be frustrating, in many cases, a tie can be a just result in a football game.

Turn back the clock and consider last night's game as if it were twenty or so years ago and  there was no provision for OT in a football game.  HCPN would then have been faced with this decision:  Do I kick and settle for a tie, or do I go for two to win the game against a heavily favored team in its home stadium?  It would have been a hard decision, if he went for two and made it, he'd have been a hero, and a bum of they didn't make it.  If he settled for the tie, well, at least it wouldn't have been a loss.  The point is, with overtime, no coach HAS to make this decision, and I think that the coaches like it that this particular bit of heat has been removed from their kitchens.  

For all his greatness as a coach, Ara Parseghian is, rightly or wrongly, just as often remembered for his decision to have Notre Dame "settle" for a tie against Michigan State in 1966's Game of the Century.  Conversely, Nebraska Tom Osborne is often remembered for his "heroic" decision to have his team go for two points and win the Orange Bowl, rather than settle for a tie against Miami. Only the mythical national championship was at stake in that game.  The Huskers didn't make it and lost the game, but Osborne was still lauded for his decision.

I know I am a lone voice in the wilderness on this, but I think that overtime should be eliminated in all but play-off and championship games in football.  This is especially true in an age when player safety is such a big issue.  I attended one of my nephew's peewee football games a few years ago.  The game ended in a tie, and they went into overtime to determine a winner.  In a peewee football game, is that really necessary?

To Absent Friends - Moses Malone

Moses Malone

1955-2015

When news of the death of Moses Malone arrived earlier in the week, I had not planned on doing one of these post dedicated to him.  Then I started to read a bit about him, and then I  heard Tony Kornheiser speak about him on his radio podcast on Monday. Then came the  write-up on him in the new Sports Illustrated, and I thought that this guy deserves to be noted.

Malone was the first player to skip college entirely and go directly to the pros from high school.  He was drafted by and signed by the then Utah Stars of the ABA, and thus began a career that would span nine different teams, twenty-one seasons, three NBA MVP Awards, and one championship season with the Philadelphia 76'ers in 1983.  Malone's career spanned a time when I was paying little attention to pro basketball, and the media coverage of the NBA paled in comparison to what it is today, so I was unaware of what a dominant player he was.

NBA stats don't resonate as much as, say, 40 home runs or 100 RBIs in baseball, or 1,000 yards rushing in football, but Malone scored over 29,000 points and pulled down over 17,800 rebounds over those 21 seasons, averaging 20.3 and 12.3 respectively for his career.  In exactly 100 Playoffs games, Malone averaged 22.1 and 14.0.  It has been said that the fact that Malone signed with the ABA was one of the factors that forced the NBA to merge and absorb four of the ABA teams into itself.

You read about him and about just how dominant he was, well, you can only conclude that he was some kind of player.

Kornheiser told the following story.  When Malone was in high school in Petersburg, Virginia, head coach Lefty Driesell was trying desperately to recruit him to come to the University of Maryland.  He would often leave College Park and fly on single engine private planes to Petersburg to watch Malone play and try to woo him.  When people expressed concern for Driesell's safety making so many flights on such dangerous planes, Lefty's comment was "Some players are worth dying for."

RIP Moses Malone.

Book Review - "X" by Sue Grafton (No Spoilers)

Regular readers all know what a fan I am of mystery writer Sue Grafton and her "alphabet series" of novels featuring private investigator Kinsey Millhone. Simply stated, I love the series, and I downloaded the latest installment, "X", the day it first became available late last month. 

So it is with a bit of reluctance that I write this to say that this twenty-fourth installment in the adventures of Kinsey Millhone came as disappointment to me.  Unlike many novels with series characters, Grafton's books had not resorted to formula or became stale as the series went on and on.  If anything, the more recent stories in the series (and you can find them by just typing "Sue Grafton" into the search box at the upper left corner of this page), with the novels for T, U, V, and W being among the very best of the series.  Perhaps it was just me (had a lot of things going on while I was reading this one), but I had a hard time getting into this one.

In "X", Kinsey gets involved in three separate story lines, I won't even call them cases, because she was only hired and paid for one of them.  As is often the case, one of these threads takes Kinsey back over twenty years in time, and another involves a pain-in-the-rear new neighbor that seems fairly innocuous at the start. To me, it just seemed like there were too many threads in this particular story, and I had a tough time staying with it.  For all of that, however, the last seventy or so pages of the book, when the story lines were getting wrapped up, were a very entertaining read.  Two of the stories came together and were resolved more or less satisfactorily.  The third was left open, and who knows if Grafton has it in her mind to bring this one particular villain back in a future story.  Grafton/Millhone also deliver some trenchant observations about the continuum on which criminals exist and the justice system operates.

At the end of the day, I will give "X" and "C" grade, better than a lot of books out there, but not up to the higher standards of the series, but Sue Grafton and Kinsey Millhone remain among my favorite authors and fictional characters.  It is sad to think that this series will come to an end with books Y and Z, sometime before the end of this decade, as Grafton has promised.

The Great Akron Road Trip of 2015

Okay, by now you all know that Pitt defeated the University of Akron on Saturday night by a score of 24-7 and extended its record to 2-0, but now I want to tell you.....THE REST OF THE STORY......

Back in the summer when the Pitt football schedule was announced, Dan Bonk noted that the game against Akron would be played on September 12, the weather should be nice, and, hey, this might be a nice road trip to take - out and back in the same day - and take our wives with us.  When the dust settled, it was going to be a quadruple date - Sproules, Bonks, Martins, and Meisners. Hail to Pitt!

Well, as the weather forecasts were becoming more and more ominous as the week went on, a game day decision was made early Saturday morning, and the four wives decided that discretion was the better part of valor, so they opted out.  At 2:00, Dan, Len, Tom and I set out in Dan's car for Akron.  Yes, in keeping with a college football theme, 'neath a slate gray September sky, the Four Horsemen rode again.....

The further west we rode, the worse those skies became, and the more the rain continued to fall.  We arrived in Akron, parked about two hours before game time, and whiled away about an hour and a quarter enjoying one of Akron's finest just-off-campus dining establishments (Taco Bell).  We entered the Stadium, and posed for posterity, while light-to-moderate rain fell.

(Bob, Dan, Tom, and Len)

Little did we know at the time, that that was about the BEST that the weather was going to be that evening.  

We settled into our seats, 

and proceeded to take in the action on the field.

Did you ever watch a game on TV that was being played in a torrential downpour, with only a few people in the stands and say to yourself "What kind of idiots would be sitting in the stands at a game like this?"  Well, now you know.

At halftime we retreated under the stands, watched the third quarter while standing behind a camera well, only to see the rain get even worse:

At the end of the third quarter, with Pitt up 17-7, we left the Stadium and headed home, taking one last look backward.

A crazy night, but a fun one, and in the car ride back home we were already laughing about the whole night.  I can envision that with each retelling of the story, the rain will become more and more torrential, the temperatures will get lower and lower (in fact, the temps were pretty nice, which saved us from a REALLY bad evening), the winds will become hurricane force, and the entire storm will be of Biblical proportions.  By the 2018 retelling of this trip, we will have had needed an Ark to get home.

Oh, and we, or at least I, did learn one interesting factoid.  Did you know that John Heisman, the guy who invented trophies, once coached at the University of Akron? No?  Well he did, and a statue memorializing his tenure there sits just outside the main gate of the Stadium (a very nice facility, by the way).

And now you know, the REST of the story.