Instead, I am going to take another approach here. Pedro, with his jaw-dropping power and jaw-dropping fielding prowess, has often been compared with former Pirate Dick Stuart, especially since his move from third base to first base. A question was raised in a Facebook forum just this morning, "Is Pedro the next Dick Stuart?"
So, I decided to open up a spread sheet and make a comparison between the two.
The numbers you will see below reflect Stuart's career only during his five seasons as a Pirate. He went on, of course, to a ten year career with five other teams, most notably, the Boston Red Sox. Alvarez' numbers are current through yesterday's game against the Rockies.
Here you go:
|
Dick Stuart |
Pedro Alvarez |
Seasons |
5
|
6
|
Plate Appearances |
2.213
|
2,765
|
Hits |
550
|
587
|
BA |
0.273
|
0.243
|
HR |
117
|
130
|
RBI |
390
|
399
|
OPS |
0.839
|
0.750
|
Strike Outs |
483
|
806
|
Walks |
158
|
254
|
K:W Ratio |
3.06 to 1 |
3.17 to 1 |
Errors |
90
|
131
|
All-Star Teams |
1
|
1
|
In all honesty, I don't know what to make of these. If you look at HR and RBI, which one could argue is what the Pirates have paid these two to do, a slight edge goes to Pedro. Other categories favor, slightly, Stuart. OPS is clearly in Big Stu's favor. The errors tell a very bad story for both of them, especially Pedro.
Here are a couple of other stats for you who like modern analytics. Stuart's WAR (Wins Above Replacement player) for his entire ten year career was 7.8. Alvarez' WAR for his six years and counting career is 5.0.
In his career, Stuart made $278,500. Alvarez has thus far earned $14,350,000. That ought to get the old-timers riled up.
As I said, I have a hard time drawing any conclusions here. The rest of you all can have at it.
Some very good Pedro related stats in this article:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.bucsdugout.com/2015/9/23/9384925/why-the-pirates-should-retain-neil-walker-but-not-pedro-alvarez