Thursday, January 23, 2020
NFL Quarterbacks in Transition 2020
Thursday, January 17, 2019
A Tale of Three Quarterbacks
Ben Roethlisberger | Eli Manning | Phillip Rivers | |
Games Played | 216 | 232 | 212 |
Games Started | 214 | 230 | 208 |
Completion % | 64.4 | 60.3 | 64.5 |
Total Passing Yards | 56,194 | 55,981 | 54,656 |
TD Passes | 363 | 360 | 374 |
TD Pass % | 5.1 | 4.5 | 5.3 |
Interceptions | 190 | 239 | 178 |
Int. % | 2.7 | 3.0 | 2.5 |
QB Record | 144-69-1 | 116-114 | 118-90 |
Winning % | 0.675 | 0.504 | 0.567 |
QB Rating | 94.2 | 84.1 | 95.6 |
PLAYOFFS | |||
Games | 21 | 12 | 11 |
Completion % | 62.4 | 60.5 | 59.4 |
TD Passes | 30 | 18 | 14 |
Interceptions | 24 | 9 | 10 |
Record | 13-8 | 8-4 | 5-6 |
Winning % | 0.612 | 0.667 | 0.455 |
Super Bowl Record | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-0 |
Ben Roethlisberger | Eli Manning | Phillip Rivers | Tom Brady | |
Games Played | 216 | 232 | 212 | 269 |
Games Started | 214 | 230 | 208 | 267 |
Completion % | 64.4 | 60.3 | 64.5 | 64.0 |
Total Passing Yards | 56,194 | 55,981 | 54,656 | 70,514 |
TD Passes | 363 | 360 | 374 | 517 |
TD Pass % | 5.1 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 5.5 |
Interceptions | 190 | 239 | 178 | 171 |
Int. % | 2.7 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 1.8 |
QB Record | 144-69-1 | 116-114 | 118-90 | 207-60 |
Winning % | 0.675 | 0.504 | 0.567 | 0.775 |
QB Rating | 94.2 | 84.1 | 95.6 | 97.6 |
PLAYOFFS | ||||
Games | 21 | 12 | 11 | 38 |
Completion % | 62.4 | 60.5 | 59.4 | 63.3 |
TD Passes | 30 | 18 | 14 | 72 |
Interceptions | 24 | 9 | 10 | 31 |
Record | 13-8 | 8-4 | 5-6 | 28-10 |
Winning % | 0.612 | 0.667 | 0.455 | 0.737 |
Super Bowl Record | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 5-3 |
Is there any doubt who the greatest quarterback of this century, if not of all time, is? Brady has led his team to EIGHT SUPER BOWLS (and has a good chance of making in nine in another couple of days). Let that sink in. That is just an unbelievable fact, and I doubt that it will ever happen again. Ever.
Brady | Roethlisberger | Manning | Rivers | |
Comebacks | 35 | 31 | 27 | 26 |
Game Winning Drives | 44 | 42 | 37 | 30 |
If you believe that a quarterback really and truly earns his keep late in the game, when your team is down, when their back is to the wall, and any other cliche you care to use, then you see that Roethlisberger, given four fewer seasons in the league, is right there with Brady in these particular categories. However, we all know what the Brady-Ben record is when these two guys have gone head to head over the years, and it is pretty one sided in Brady's favor.
Monday, August 20, 2012
Speaking of Sports
Now, all that said, how about that 19 inning win in St. Louis yesterday? Our Parish Picnic took place yesterday afternoon, so I figured that I would not see any of the game, and thus would not agonize over it at all. I would come home from the picnic and learn that they either won or lost. You know what happened. People with their smart phones at the picnic kept giving the updates: tied after eight...tied after nine...game's now in the 11th...the 12th...the 15th...and so it went. (By the way, how long has it been since updates of Pirates games were of any interest at events such as church picnics in August?) While driving home, I heard them go ahead in the top of the 17th, only to get home and see the Cardinals tie it in the bottom of the 17th. Then came the 19th. A loss could have been devastating, but a win felt positively euphoric.
The Jerry Meals demons have been exorcised! Raise the Jolly Roger!!
Time to take care of business in San Diego. The Pirates owe a little payback to the padres from events of last week, it seems to me.
*****
In other sports news, the Steelers had their second practice game of the summer last night, a come from behind win over the Colts.
Here are my impressions so far:
- I do not feel real good about the running back situation.
- In last night's game and in last week's game with the Eagles, the Steelers had first and goal opportunities, whereupon they resorted to good old fashioned "Steelers football" and ran the ball, as Steelers Nation and Art III have been wanting, and in both instances, ended up losing yardage and settling for field goals. I know, they're exhibition games, so who cares, but there are going to be times, many times, in the course of the season when the Steelers will need to score touchdowns in those situations. So far, it hasn't worked out too well.
- Maybe Art III can find a clone of Fran Rogel and sign him to "run the ball".
- I've already had my fill of the incessant navel gazing by the talking heads over the "new Todd Hailey-led Steelers offense".
- Oh, and Andrew Luck looked pretty good for the Colts last night. He much have a pretty sharp offensive coordinator coaching him.
Monday, February 6, 2012
Big Win for Big Blue
Going into the game, I had no great emotional investment. I neither liked nor disliked either team enough to have a strong rooting interest. I just wanted a good, if not great, ballgame. On the surface, this game had all the elements of such a game. Two masterful Tom Brady-led drives at the end of the first half and beginning of the second half that gave the Pats a 17-9 lead, a terrific end of game 88 yard Manning-led drive that led to the winning TD with :57 left to play, and even a Brady hail mary heave that had you on the edge as the game ended.
Despite all of that, when it was all over, and perhaps it was that lack of emotional investment alluded to earlier, I was left with a sort of well-it's-over-now-bring-on-Spring-Training-baseball kind of feeling.
Also, when the winning touchdown in the Super Bowl is one that the defense let happen and the offense did not want to score, well it lends a kind of surreal feeling to the whole thing. The strategy on both sides for this bizarre happenstance can be defended - Bill Bellichick is a genius, after all - but something about it just doesn't sit right.
As for the other Super Bowl sideshows...
Madonna at halftime. Another aging rocker struts her stuff at the Super Bowl. Haven't we seen this before? Did you notice how she almost fell trying to mount one of those steps? Do we really need all this ridiculous spectacle and fireworks? If we really need a singer, how about bringing him/her/them out with a back-up band and a microphone and have him/her/them sing a few songs? Or, how about a dog and a frisbee?
Commercials. Twelve hours after the fact, I can remember the following: the cat killing dog for Doritos, the baby in the slingshot for Doritos again, the eTrade baby, "Wego" the dog for Bud Light, the Budweiser prohibition-is-over spots, the bulldog outracing the greyhounds for some kind of sneaker, the lady head-butting her husband over some kind of yogurt, the dog that worked out to lose weight for some kind of car, chimps in suits for CareerBuilder, and the Fiat commercial with some incredibly hot woman drinking some kind of foamy coffee drink. That's it. That's the list.
Oh, and one more note on commercials. Danica Patrick wants it both ways. She wants to be taken seriously as a major competitive athlete/driver and not be put down because she is a woman in a man's world, yet she continues to do commercials that tease us with the idea that if you go to the website, you just might get to see her naked. Which is it going to be, Danica?
Oh, and The Grandstander got his prediction wrong (see post of last Friday) and closes the NFL post-season with a 7-4 record. Not bad. However, in my pre-season write-up, where I listed about a dozen or so teams, one of whom would win the Super Bowl, the New York Giants were not included on that list. Not good.
Twelve days until pitchers & catchers report in Bradenton.
Friday, February 3, 2012
Super Bowl Prediction

- A strong defense that got hot at the perfect time in the season
- Eli Manning has looked terrific in the playoffs, and proved in 49'er game that he can withstand even the fiercest of NFL defenses
- They have demonstrated a knack to beat the Patriots in recent years, most notably in the Super Bowl four years ago
Giants - Cons
- They seem a bit mouthy and over-confident
- They were only a 9-7 team during the year
- They lost twice, convincingly, to the God-awful Washington Redskins
Patriots - Pros
- They have Tom Brady
- They have, like it or not, Bill Belichick as head coach, and he's pretty good
- They have Rob Gronkowski
- Brady looked like he was from another world in the playoff game against the Broncos
Patriots - Cons
- They have, at best, a very ordinary defense
- Until they beat the Ravens two weeks ago, they had not beaten a team with a winning record all season
- Rob Gronkowski is injured and his effectiveness for Sunday is unknown at this time
- Brady looked very ordinary in the game against the Ravens
So, considering all of these factors, I had been leaning towards picking the Giants to win. However, something last night just clicked in my head and has told me that Brady is going tom take charge and that the Patriots are going to avenge the loss of four years ago and take care of business in Indy on Sunday. There you have it...the PATRIOTS to win on Sunday.
Should this happen, there will, of course, be some major angst among the Yinzers of Steelers Nation as this will mean that Belichick will now join Chuck Noll as the only head coach to have won four Super Bowls, and Brady will join Terry Bradshaw and Joe Montana (who played in the WPIAL, which is almost as good as being a Steeler) as the only QB to have played on four Super Bowl winning teams. Should the Patriots win, I predict that the first call to The Fan stating that Belichick's four wins "shouldn't count" because he "cheated by video tapin' n'at" will come in before midnight on Sunday.
Let's hope it's a great game, with lots of great commercials, and an entertaining performance by Madonna at halftime.
Enjoy!!